<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top it off colorfully</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pixelshooter.net/top-it-off-colorfully/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pixelshooter.net/top-it-off-colorfully/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pratap</title>
		<link>http://pixelshooter.net/top-it-off-colorfully/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelshooter.net/?p=650#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Thank you for your detailed critique. I think you are referring to vignetting when you say &quot;darkening the perimeter &quot;. This is a very common technique in post. I agree that it would work here to avoid the distracting elements. But I wanted to leave this image as natural as possible because I wanted to convey the colorfulness I saw in reality - which is the most striking aspect of this photograph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Thank you for your detailed critique. I think you are referring to vignetting when you say &#8220;darkening the perimeter &#8220;. This is a very common technique in post. I agree that it would work here to avoid the distracting elements. But I wanted to leave this image as natural as possible because I wanted to convey the colorfulness I saw in reality &#8211; which is the most striking aspect of this photograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R. Sittinger</title>
		<link>http://pixelshooter.net/top-it-off-colorfully/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>John R. Sittinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelshooter.net/?p=650#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>Very nice. Obviously, a very colorful choice of subject. Lovely contrasts. More subtle is the repetition of forms (lots of triangles, also nice). Good cropping, as well. I always seem to fuss over where to &quot;draw the lines&quot; when I want my subject to pop &amp; have a little left over around the edges. I&#039;ve tried darkening the perimeter matter in PS, sometimes with good results (I did this extensively with some of my orchid pictures) but that can cut down on the realism &amp; immediacy of your image. The details in the bottom right corner, for example, detract a bit from the overall symmetry of the picture but add a delightful sense of place. 

Anyway, I like it. Keep on posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. Obviously, a very colorful choice of subject. Lovely contrasts. More subtle is the repetition of forms (lots of triangles, also nice). Good cropping, as well. I always seem to fuss over where to &#8220;draw the lines&#8221; when I want my subject to pop &amp; have a little left over around the edges. I&#8217;ve tried darkening the perimeter matter in PS, sometimes with good results (I did this extensively with some of my orchid pictures) but that can cut down on the realism &amp; immediacy of your image. The details in the bottom right corner, for example, detract a bit from the overall symmetry of the picture but add a delightful sense of place. </p>
<p>Anyway, I like it. Keep on posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

